| ![]() |
|||||||||||||||||
Issue: Transit and TrafficThe Costs of Car CultureTo appreciate the lunacy of transit policies one need look no further than the impact of cars on the city.
Ontario Transit FundingOne would think that these facts demand that there be a massive investment in public transit, but the reality is just the opposite. Since the early 1990s politicians have driven the TTC almost to the point of insolvency and fares have been increased to the point where ridership is suffering. As an added frustration to Torontonians the provincial government heavily subsidizes GO transit, which services the wealthy suburbs surrounding Toronto, and largely ignores the funding needs of the TTC. These are comparative statistics and budget figures.
In 2002, 82% of the funds of the TTC came out of the fare box and 18% came from the City of Toronto. Funding support for the TTC is lower than any other transit system on the continent. By contrast, the GO system was built and maintained by provincial funds. Recently provincial politicians announced a $9 billion capital investment in GO over the next 10 years.
Population and Transit PolicyThe funding crisis of the TTC has led to fare increases and a deterioration of services. This led to a drop in the number of riders. Ridership on the system was at its peak in 1989 with 460 million passengers per year. In the early 1990s it plummeted, reaching a low of 370 million passengers a year in 1997. Since that time ridership has slowly recovered to 420 million passengers a year, but it is still below peak levels. Studies show that when fares are increased ridership drops. While TTC ridership has declined since 1990, the population of the city increased by 11% in the same period. Transit market share of transportation in the city fell from 25% in 1986 to 21% in 2001. The population of the City of Toronto is expected to grow by 20% and employment to grow by 27% between the years of 2001 and 2031. The TTC has developed plans to be able to meet this growth, but the transit system has no money to implement these plans.
Public Transit and Land Use Planning The city is responsible for land use planning in its borders. The new official plan of Toronto calls for “avenues” of high density residential housing and commercial development to be built. This provides an opportunity for the TTC because high density means that transit can be paid for out of the fare box. Low densities make it impossible to provide good transit without large subsidies. But it takes money to build this new infrastructure and the TTC simply does not have the money. The most comprehensive analysis of the issues facing the transit system can be found in the TTC study: “Ridership Growth Strategy.” It can be found at: http://www.city.toronto.on.ca/ttc/ridership_growth_strategy.htm (link opens in a new window.)
Towards a New TTC: In the “Ridership Growth Strategy” reports that the TTC needs $234 million per year in capital funding and $80 million per year in operating funding to expand the system and meet basic transit needs. This should be seen as a minimum and should be provided by both the provincial and federal governments both though gasoline tax rebates to municipalities and direct grants. The City of Toronto also must maintain its level of funding of $178 million a year. Once the funding crisis of the TTC is solved these are the principles that must shape the transit system:
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Home Hot News Toronto City Council Ward By Ward Voting Records Election Finances Issues In Depth Homelessness Political Fault Lines Crime & The Police Budget Debate Island Airport Taxation Transit and Traffic The Planning Process Our Key Issues VoteToronto Archive About VoteToronto Volunteers |
||||||||||||||||||
|
E-mail info@votetoronto.ca |
||||||||||||||||||